About a month or so ago, I decided to try something new to me in photography: medium format film. This week I’d like to discuss what medium format is, and the effect that the switch back to film after a long time shooting digital has had on my photography.
Medium format is a larger film than the ubiquitous 35mm we’re all familiar with. It comes in various flavors (eg. 645 and 6×7 among others), but they all share one side of 6cm in length and use the same “120″ size film. Medium format has been around since the beginning of last century and has been first choice for many areas of professional photography where the very best quality prints are essential.
These days though, affordable high-resolution digital cameras have all but supplanted medium format in the more dynamic kinds of professional capture such as at weddings, where digitals adaptability and flexibility give it a distinct advantage. However, medium format film is still very popular in areas of pro photography where you have time and/or control over the conditions such as shooting landscape or in the studio, and also with those to whom photography is art to be viewed in a gallery.
But more important than what medium format actually is, is the effect the switch to film has had as to how I personally practice my photography.
On the down-side, the camera shares the issue typical with most film cameras – once the film is in you can’t change it. In addition, it’s big, heavy and doesn’t exactly get out of the way of your photography. The camera I use is totally manual – I have to set the aperture, shutter speed and focus manually – meaning off-the-cuff opportunistic shots are almost totally out of the question. Also a roll of film is about three times more expensive than 35mm and only yields 10 frames.
There is a flip-side to this. Once the shutter fires, I can’t take it back, I can’t immediately see what I’ve got, and there is a definite price tag on each shot. This is the flip-side? It is. As it turns out, this has been of real benefit to my photography. It has forced me to think about each shot much more carefully than when shooting digital.
With a DSLR you are free to take multiple pictures – different compositions, choices of aperture and exposure, etc. – but with medium format I have to consider every single shot in much more detail. I’m not free to just fire away carte-blanche, choose the best and delete the rest. I typically get one chance only to get the best photograph and I try to make quite sure I’m going to get it. Sure, I’m not as productive, but my percentage of keepers has increased two-fold over what I was getting with my DSLR.
This isn’t a film vs. digital issue, it’s all about attitude and approach. Shooting film, especially a more expensive format like medium format, forces close attention on technique – your choice of aperture, focal point and especially composition. I highly recommend grabbing a film camera once in a while as a wake-up call.









